If ChatGPT Provides Persuasive False Scientific Abstracts That Deceive Reviewers

If ChatGPT Provides Persuasive False Scientific Abstracts That Deceive Reviewers

When ChatGPT Reviewers Provide Deceptively Convincing False Scientific Abstracts – ItBlinded human reviewers were only able to detect 68% of ChatGPT-generated abstracts when presented with a mix of authentic and fraudulently generated abstracts. In addition, 14% of the original abstracts were mistakenly labeled as artificial intelligence produced by the reviewers. Northwestern University

If ChatGPT Provides Persuasive False Scientific Abstracts That Deceive Reviewers

Be the first to comment

Leave a response

Your email address will not be published.


*